Council unveils grounds for High Court challenge in airport row
- Credit: Archant
Planners adopted a "blinkered" approach to climate policy before green-lighting Stansted Airport's expansion plans, Uttlesford District Council has claimed.
In documents submitted to the High Court of Justice, UDC lawyers accused the government's Planning Inspectorate of "a serious failure to understand" climate change policy after it gave Stansted Airport the go-ahead to expand its capacity by eight million passengers each year.
UDC has unveiled the two grounds it could use to overturn the Planning Inspectorate's ruling in online documents, and 11 grounds to avoid paying Stansted Airport's appeal bill, a sum yet to be announced.
UDC hopes to secure the review by the autumn.
First, UDC has accused the Inspectorate of "excluding" a raft of climate change policies, and considering just three documents which form a single "national aviation policy" framework.
The submission reads: "The Planning Inspectorate Panel's approach to relevant climate change/carbon policies was blinkered."
It adds: "This was a serious failure to understand and apply relevant policy."
- 1 Fears that Covid may cause Essex hospital staffing to get ‘very difficult’
- 2 Dinosaur park decision made
- 3 Supermarkets issue urgent product recall after salmonella found in products
- 4 How Malcolm's work is having an impact in Uttlesford
- 5 Cyclist dies after collision near The Notleys
- 6 Memories are made of this for Bob as Barnston and High Roding meet at last
- 7 Protesters call on Kemi Badenoch MP to oppose controversial crime bill
- 8 TV adverts will challenge Essex TOWIE stereotypes
- 9 Campaigners quiz council over its Wethersfield prisons letters
- 10 Growth in Stansted Airport holiday bookings a 'boon' for Great Dunmow
Relevant policy refers to a series of reports and legislation which includes the UK's Sixth Carbon Budget.
Carbon Budget Six came into force in June and puts pressure on the international aviation industry to help the government meet its Net Zero by 2050 goal.
The council's second argument for a judicial review is that planners "unreasonably" overturned a council-imposed planning condition - known as Condition 15 - to limit noise, air quality and carbon emissions.
UDC argues Condition 15 meets a national planning policy requirement to make sure new builds find a balance between today's and future generations' needs.
A UDC spokesperson said: "The Planning Inspectorate panel failed to properly explain why it had rejected that condition."
The Planning Inspectorate also ruled UDC must pay Stansted Airport's appeal bill when it made its decision in May.
They said: "Inspectors are independent and impartial.
"When making a decision, inspectors give careful consideration to the evidence submitted at the time of the appeal taking account of current planning legislation, guidance and policy."