Campaign group accuse owners of Stansted Airport and district council of having a “cash for favours” agreement to rush through planning application

PUBLISHED: 08:38 15 March 2018 | UPDATED: 08:44 15 March 2018

An aerial shot of Stansted Airport

An aerial shot of Stansted Airport

Archant

A campaign group aiming to stop the expansion of Stansted Airport has accused Uttlesford District Council and the owners of the airport of having a “cash for favours” secret agreement over a recently-submitted planning application.

Stop Stansted Expansion (SSE) has accused Uttlesford District Council (UDC) and Manchester Airports Group (MAG) of having an agreement involving financial contribution which, it says, is allowing the planning application to be rushed through without adequate scrutiny.

MAG and UDC have a Planning Policy Agreement (PPA) which is separate from the planning application fee and states that MAG will contribute £117,781 to the costs of project managing the application.

The breakdown of the costs for consultants, pre-application discussions and specialist knowledge has not been revealed.

SSE said that while it is not unheard of for a developer to contribute to the costs of handling a planning application, it insisted the UDC agreement had “strings attached”.

SSE said the money was conditional upon UDC meeting target dates to speed up the progress of Manchester Airports Group’s planning application.

SSE deputy chairman, Brian Ross said: “We’ve been concerned for some time about this planning application being rushed through and we’re now beginning to understand why this may be happening. In the interests of public trust and transparency UDC should immediately publish its agreement with MAG and disclose the level of financial contribution involved.

“Our central concern is the way they are rushing through the application giving no chance for proper scrutiny.”

SSE said the district council and MAG had “agreed a very tight timetable” of giving only a month more than the usual planning deadline.

It said the last comparable airport planning application, made by Heathrow Airport in 2006 for an additional 10million passengers per annum, allowed more than seven months for a decision to be made and “this enabled detailed consideration of the impacts and extensive public consultation”.

SSE said: “MAG may be providing the means for the UDC planning department to move into overdrive but parish and town councils, members of the public and local community organisations may not be able to keep pace.

“The price for an accelerated timetable is less public scrutiny and less community engagement.”

A UDC spokesman said: “The claims and inferences made by Stop Stansted Expansion are inaccurate and demonstrate a lack of understanding of the planning process.

“The PPA is separate from the planning application fee and will provide for the relevant officer time to project manage the application, dedicated time from Essex County Council officers as well as the cost of external consultancy advice. The council is not allowed to make a surplus from these arrangements but can properly recover its costs.

“Significantly, the existence of a PPA does not in any way impact on a planning authority in determining the outcome of any planning application. The council will be judging the planning application on its individual merits, taking into account environmental issues such as noise and air quality, as well as comments made by members of the public.”

The total fee payable to UDC according to the PPA document is £117,781.

A spokesman for Stansted Airport said: “Agreeing how an application like this will be considered by the local authority is an entirely normal part of the process for reaching a decision, including recognising what additional time and resource may be required by UDC to review the application.

“We have met all our obligations on our legal and planning requirements to deliver an application that we believe allows UDC to determine it on its merits within the required timescales.”

0 comments

Welcome , please leave your message below.

Optional - JPG files only
Optional - MP3 files only
Optional - 3GP, AVI, MOV, MPG or WMV files
Comments

Please log in to leave a comment and share your views with other Dunmow Broadcast visitors.

We enable people to post comments with the aim of encouraging open debate.

Only people who register and sign up to our terms and conditions can post comments. These terms and conditions explain our house rules and legal guidelines.

Comments are not edited by Dunmow Broadcast staff prior to publication but may be automatically filtered.

If you have a complaint about a comment please contact us by clicking on the Report This Comment button next to the comment.

Not a member yet?

Register to create your own unique Dunmow Broadcast account for free.

Signing up is free, quick and easy and offers you the chance to add comments, personalise the site with local information picked just for you, and more.

Sign up now

More news stories

00:00

Endurance Estates Strategic Land would like to invite you to attend a public exhibition to discuss their proposals for the development of up to 120 new homes, public open space, and a care home, at Land at Parsonage Road, Takeley.

Yesterday, 14:53

Emptying bins and running the recycling service remains the most important priority for Uttlesford District Council, according to residents who completed a recent survey.

Yesterday, 12:45

A former police officer based in Essex has been found guilty of gross misconduct after having a sexually explicit conversation with a convicted paedophile and failing to report it.

Yesterday, 08:22

Nearly 400 students and staff members at Great Dunmow Primary School formed a giant poppy, which could be seen from the skies, to finish a week of remembrance.

Digital Edition

Image
Read the Dunmow Broadcast e-edition E-edition

Most read stories

Newsletter Sign Up

Dunmow Broadcast weekly newsletter
Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter

Our Privacy Policy